Review



triple mutant  (Innoprot Inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol Innoprot Inc is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Innoprot Inc manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 94

    Structured Review

    Innoprot Inc triple mutant
    Triple Mutant, supplied by Innoprot Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 3 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/triple+mutant/pm41980560-49-8-15?v=Innoprot+Inc
    Average 94 stars, based on 3 article reviews
    triple mutant - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    94/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    94
    Innoprot Inc triple mutant
    Triple Mutant, supplied by Innoprot Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/triple+mutant/pm41980560-49-8-15?v=Innoprot+Inc
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    triple mutant - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Jackson Laboratory zeb2 triple enhancer mutant mice
    Zeb2 Triple Enhancer Mutant Mice, supplied by Jackson Laboratory, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/triple+mutant/pmc12873219-283-18-40?v=Jackson+Laboratory
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    zeb2 triple enhancer mutant mice - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Kuang Lung Shing triple mutants 9
    Triple Mutants 9, supplied by Kuang Lung Shing, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/triple+mutant/pm41408760-264-12-47?v=Kuang+Lung+Shing
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    triple mutants 9 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Addgene inc hif2α triple mutant
    ( A ) Rescue of GLS1 clustering by DMOG treatment is reversed by <t>HIF2</t> α but not HIF1 α knockout (KO) in HUVECs. Correlation coefficient ( r ) for GLS1 (red) and COX IV (green) is shown on the right. ( B ) Western blotting analysis showing the validation of HIF1 α KO and HIF2 α KO in HUVECs. gRNAs are numbered 1–4 on top. V, vector. HIF1 α gRNA1 and HIF2 α gRNA2 were selected in the assays. ( C ) qPCR analysis showing the validation of DMOG and HIF2α transcriptional inhibitors in HUVECs. HIF1α target genes: LDHA , HK2 , ENO1 , and PDK1 . HIF2α target genes: VEGFA and DLL4 . ( D ) No reversal of the DMOG-induced GLS1 redistribution by inhibitors targeting the transcriptional activity of HIF2α. ( E ) Rescue of noQ-induced cell death by DMOG treatment in HUVECs. *** P < 0.001; **** P < 0.0001 by 1-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc testing. Scale bars: 10 μm ( A and D ) and 100 μm ( E ).
    Hif2α Triple Mutant, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/triple+mutant/pmc12890500-190-13-17?v=Addgene+inc
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    hif2α triple mutant - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Vigene Biosciences cdkn2aip‐triple mutant: p484a/l485a/k486a‐cdkn2aip
    ( A ) Rescue of GLS1 clustering by DMOG treatment is reversed by <t>HIF2</t> α but not HIF1 α knockout (KO) in HUVECs. Correlation coefficient ( r ) for GLS1 (red) and COX IV (green) is shown on the right. ( B ) Western blotting analysis showing the validation of HIF1 α KO and HIF2 α KO in HUVECs. gRNAs are numbered 1–4 on top. V, vector. HIF1 α gRNA1 and HIF2 α gRNA2 were selected in the assays. ( C ) qPCR analysis showing the validation of DMOG and HIF2α transcriptional inhibitors in HUVECs. HIF1α target genes: LDHA , HK2 , ENO1 , and PDK1 . HIF2α target genes: VEGFA and DLL4 . ( D ) No reversal of the DMOG-induced GLS1 redistribution by inhibitors targeting the transcriptional activity of HIF2α. ( E ) Rescue of noQ-induced cell death by DMOG treatment in HUVECs. *** P < 0.001; **** P < 0.0001 by 1-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc testing. Scale bars: 10 μm ( A and D ) and 100 μm ( E ).
    Cdkn2aip‐Triple Mutant: P484a/L485a/K486a‐Cdkn2aip, supplied by Vigene Biosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/triple+mutant/pmc12130737-72-8-12?v=Vigene+Biosciences
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cdkn2aip‐triple mutant: p484a/l485a/k486a‐cdkn2aip - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Addgene inc mac sta5a
    ( A ) Rescue of GLS1 clustering by DMOG treatment is reversed by <t>HIF2</t> α but not HIF1 α knockout (KO) in HUVECs. Correlation coefficient ( r ) for GLS1 (red) and COX IV (green) is shown on the right. ( B ) Western blotting analysis showing the validation of HIF1 α KO and HIF2 α KO in HUVECs. gRNAs are numbered 1–4 on top. V, vector. HIF1 α gRNA1 and HIF2 α gRNA2 were selected in the assays. ( C ) qPCR analysis showing the validation of DMOG and HIF2α transcriptional inhibitors in HUVECs. HIF1α target genes: LDHA , HK2 , ENO1 , and PDK1 . HIF2α target genes: VEGFA and DLL4 . ( D ) No reversal of the DMOG-induced GLS1 redistribution by inhibitors targeting the transcriptional activity of HIF2α. ( E ) Rescue of noQ-induced cell death by DMOG treatment in HUVECs. *** P < 0.001; **** P < 0.0001 by 1-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc testing. Scale bars: 10 μm ( A and D ) and 100 μm ( E ).
    Mac Sta5a, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/triple+mutant/pmc12208539-243-10-16?v=Addgene+inc
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mac sta5a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Medicago gene‐edited mtsoc1 triple mutant medicago plants
    ( A ) Rescue of GLS1 clustering by DMOG treatment is reversed by <t>HIF2</t> α but not HIF1 α knockout (KO) in HUVECs. Correlation coefficient ( r ) for GLS1 (red) and COX IV (green) is shown on the right. ( B ) Western blotting analysis showing the validation of HIF1 α KO and HIF2 α KO in HUVECs. gRNAs are numbered 1–4 on top. V, vector. HIF1 α gRNA1 and HIF2 α gRNA2 were selected in the assays. ( C ) qPCR analysis showing the validation of DMOG and HIF2α transcriptional inhibitors in HUVECs. HIF1α target genes: LDHA , HK2 , ENO1 , and PDK1 . HIF2α target genes: VEGFA and DLL4 . ( D ) No reversal of the DMOG-induced GLS1 redistribution by inhibitors targeting the transcriptional activity of HIF2α. ( E ) Rescue of noQ-induced cell death by DMOG treatment in HUVECs. *** P < 0.001; **** P < 0.0001 by 1-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc testing. Scale bars: 10 μm ( A and D ) and 100 μm ( E ).
    Gene‐Edited Mtsoc1 Triple Mutant Medicago Plants, supplied by Medicago, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/triple+mutant/pm40169950-366-15-21?v=Medicago
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    gene‐edited mtsoc1 triple mutant medicago plants - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Medicago gene edited mtsoc1a mtsoc1b mtsoc1c triple mutants
    ( A ) Rescue of GLS1 clustering by DMOG treatment is reversed by <t>HIF2</t> α but not HIF1 α knockout (KO) in HUVECs. Correlation coefficient ( r ) for GLS1 (red) and COX IV (green) is shown on the right. ( B ) Western blotting analysis showing the validation of HIF1 α KO and HIF2 α KO in HUVECs. gRNAs are numbered 1–4 on top. V, vector. HIF1 α gRNA1 and HIF2 α gRNA2 were selected in the assays. ( C ) qPCR analysis showing the validation of DMOG and HIF2α transcriptional inhibitors in HUVECs. HIF1α target genes: LDHA , HK2 , ENO1 , and PDK1 . HIF2α target genes: VEGFA and DLL4 . ( D ) No reversal of the DMOG-induced GLS1 redistribution by inhibitors targeting the transcriptional activity of HIF2α. ( E ) Rescue of noQ-induced cell death by DMOG treatment in HUVECs. *** P < 0.001; **** P < 0.0001 by 1-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc testing. Scale bars: 10 μm ( A and D ) and 100 μm ( E ).
    Gene Edited Mtsoc1a Mtsoc1b Mtsoc1c Triple Mutants, supplied by Medicago, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/triple+mutant/pmc11960017-31-0-24?v=Medicago
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    gene edited mtsoc1a mtsoc1b mtsoc1c triple mutants - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    ( A ) Rescue of GLS1 clustering by DMOG treatment is reversed by HIF2 α but not HIF1 α knockout (KO) in HUVECs. Correlation coefficient ( r ) for GLS1 (red) and COX IV (green) is shown on the right. ( B ) Western blotting analysis showing the validation of HIF1 α KO and HIF2 α KO in HUVECs. gRNAs are numbered 1–4 on top. V, vector. HIF1 α gRNA1 and HIF2 α gRNA2 were selected in the assays. ( C ) qPCR analysis showing the validation of DMOG and HIF2α transcriptional inhibitors in HUVECs. HIF1α target genes: LDHA , HK2 , ENO1 , and PDK1 . HIF2α target genes: VEGFA and DLL4 . ( D ) No reversal of the DMOG-induced GLS1 redistribution by inhibitors targeting the transcriptional activity of HIF2α. ( E ) Rescue of noQ-induced cell death by DMOG treatment in HUVECs. *** P < 0.001; **** P < 0.0001 by 1-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc testing. Scale bars: 10 μm ( A and D ) and 100 μm ( E ).

    Journal: JCI Insight

    Article Title: HIF2 α inhibits glutaminase clustering in mitochondria to sustain growth of clear cell renal cell carcinoma

    doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.182711

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Rescue of GLS1 clustering by DMOG treatment is reversed by HIF2 α but not HIF1 α knockout (KO) in HUVECs. Correlation coefficient ( r ) for GLS1 (red) and COX IV (green) is shown on the right. ( B ) Western blotting analysis showing the validation of HIF1 α KO and HIF2 α KO in HUVECs. gRNAs are numbered 1–4 on top. V, vector. HIF1 α gRNA1 and HIF2 α gRNA2 were selected in the assays. ( C ) qPCR analysis showing the validation of DMOG and HIF2α transcriptional inhibitors in HUVECs. HIF1α target genes: LDHA , HK2 , ENO1 , and PDK1 . HIF2α target genes: VEGFA and DLL4 . ( D ) No reversal of the DMOG-induced GLS1 redistribution by inhibitors targeting the transcriptional activity of HIF2α. ( E ) Rescue of noQ-induced cell death by DMOG treatment in HUVECs. *** P < 0.001; **** P < 0.0001 by 1-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc testing. Scale bars: 10 μm ( A and D ) and 100 μm ( E ).

    Article Snippet: For the HIF2α overexpression experiment, HUVECs were transfected with either a constitutively stabilized HIF2α triple mutant (HIF2α-TM; Addgene, 44027) , which carries proline-to-alanine (P405A), proline-to-valine (P530V), and asparagine-to-alanine (N851A) substitutions that stabilize the protein and maintain its transcriptional activity, or with an HIF2α-ΔC-TAD ( ) construct lacking the C-terminal transactivation domain (amino acids 821–874), which abolishes HIF2α’s transcriptional activation function.

    Techniques: Knock-Out, Western Blot, Biomarker Discovery, Plasmid Preparation, Activity Assay

    ( A and B ) Western blotting analysis for the validation of HIF2 α KO ( A ) and its translational inhibitor ( B ) in UMRC2 cells. ( C ) Resistance to noQ-induced GLS1 clustering in UMRC2 cells is reversed by HIF2 α KO. ( D ) Resistance to noQ-induced cell death in UMRC2 cells is reversed by treatment with an inhibitor of HIF2α translation. ( E ) Resistance to noQ-induced cell death in UMRC2 cells is reversed by HIF2 α KO. ( F ) Increased cell death in UMRC2 cells overexpressing the K320A mutant GLS1 compared with those overexpressing WT GLS. *** P < 0.001; **** P < 0.0001 by 1-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc testing ( C – E ) or 2-tailed Student’s t test ( F ). Scale bars: 10 μm ( C ) and 100 μm ( D – F ).

    Journal: JCI Insight

    Article Title: HIF2 α inhibits glutaminase clustering in mitochondria to sustain growth of clear cell renal cell carcinoma

    doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.182711

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A and B ) Western blotting analysis for the validation of HIF2 α KO ( A ) and its translational inhibitor ( B ) in UMRC2 cells. ( C ) Resistance to noQ-induced GLS1 clustering in UMRC2 cells is reversed by HIF2 α KO. ( D ) Resistance to noQ-induced cell death in UMRC2 cells is reversed by treatment with an inhibitor of HIF2α translation. ( E ) Resistance to noQ-induced cell death in UMRC2 cells is reversed by HIF2 α KO. ( F ) Increased cell death in UMRC2 cells overexpressing the K320A mutant GLS1 compared with those overexpressing WT GLS. *** P < 0.001; **** P < 0.0001 by 1-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc testing ( C – E ) or 2-tailed Student’s t test ( F ). Scale bars: 10 μm ( C ) and 100 μm ( D – F ).

    Article Snippet: For the HIF2α overexpression experiment, HUVECs were transfected with either a constitutively stabilized HIF2α triple mutant (HIF2α-TM; Addgene, 44027) , which carries proline-to-alanine (P405A), proline-to-valine (P530V), and asparagine-to-alanine (N851A) substitutions that stabilize the protein and maintain its transcriptional activity, or with an HIF2α-ΔC-TAD ( ) construct lacking the C-terminal transactivation domain (amino acids 821–874), which abolishes HIF2α’s transcriptional activation function.

    Techniques: Western Blot, Biomarker Discovery, Mutagenesis